Re: [LAD] LADI

On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 4:33 AM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> Modular environment is great, but integrated environment seems to be more
> effective.

statements like this are meaningless without clear qualifiers. feel
free to say "for the kind of audio/music composition that I do, and
the workflow that i use, i find an integrated environment more
effective". please don't try to make blanket statements about the way
that people use tools.

> But I also have a suggestion.
> Is it possible to create an integrated environment based on modules? That
> is, an app which would have "plugins", but not plugins in a
> sense like effects and synths only, but plugins as elements of the sequencer
> itself, like piano roll, song editor, such stuff. A person opens this app
> and starts adding elements he needs to it. For a particular project he might
> not need a piano roll, he might need only audio track arranger,
> for another projects he takes an audio track arranger and also adds a piano
> roll.
> Modules of such an app could be very different, like a loop player like
> Kluppe, etc - all the apps linux audio has to this day but remade as modules
> to an integrated sequencer.
>
> What do you think?

i think you are new to linux audio. i also think that like most users
of software, you don't actually know what you want or need - this is
not a slam or a negative criticism, just a fact of life. it wouldn't
be a problem if developers like me knew what you wanted or needed too,
but alas, neither do we.

--p
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Dec 20 16:15:04 2009