Loki Davison wrote:
> I'd love to know what's weird about libphat :) Crappy yes, weird,
> well, maybe. If you'd like to contribute to / totally change direction
> of / revive from the dead phat i'd totally approve.
If noone else is interested in picking up libphat I'm willing to
do so. I have a bit of a history of maintaining libraries that
end up being bedrock parts of the linux audio scene.
> Advice thought:
> Try and have a specific app that you use and want to make better. It's
> a much more effective idea that making something totally generic.
> After you make one app better, expand from there.
Totally agree. Good advice.
Erik
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Tue Dec 29 04:15:06 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 29 2009 - 04:15:06 EET