Le 27 janv. 2010 à 19:41, torbenh a écrit :
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:38:53PM +0000, Chris Cannam wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 9:05 PM, torbenh <torbenh@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>>> since i dont want to let jack1 codebase die in a feature freeze,
>>> i added some features.
>>>
>>> - smp aware
>>> - clickless connections
>>
>> Is there any reason why a user would prefer this over jack2?
>
> i am not sure, but there a several users which report xruns with jack2,
> where jack1 still works.
> though i am not sure if they tested jack 1.9.4 which seem ok in sync mode
> at least.
JACK2 code base can be instrumented (using the "--profile Build with engine profiling" option ) to give more precise understanding of the source of possible Xruns.
See : http://www.grame.fr/Ressources/pub/JACK2_lac2009.pdf
We cannot fix possible issues if they are not reported with some precise infos on what happens.
Stéphane
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Jan 28 00:15:03 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 28 2010 - 00:15:04 EET