On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 09:02:39PM +0100, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> for some more anecdotal evidence, this is about what i was seeing during
> my jack1/2 comparison tests. jack2 generally required one buffer size
> step more to achieve the same xrun robustness as jack1. but i'm
> generally able to use much lower latencies down to 64 (or 128 in the
> jack2 case), unless i use jconvolver, which forces me to go to at least
> 1024 so as not to max out the cpu.
That doesn't make much sense. You can instruct jconvolver
to use a minimum period size that is larger than the one
Jack* is running.
-- FA O tu, che porte, correndo si ? E guerra e morte ! _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Thu Jan 28 00:15:06 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 28 2010 - 00:15:06 EET