On Sat, 20 Mar 2010, Joshua D. Boyd wrote:
> If we get rid of the sequencer, what is so good about Hydrogen's sample
> engine that I'd want to reuse it instead of something else (other than
> compatibility with existing sample kits)?
Good question. I often hear on LAD and LAU:
1. I wish I could have Hydrogen as a plugin so I don't
have to load it's whole GUI or use its
@NEGATIVE_COMMENT@ step-sequencer.
2. I wish Hydrogen had a JACK MIDI port. (This is
actually a variation on #1 because someone wants
to use it with a sequencer like non-sequencer
or with a Wiimote-as-midi-controller).
3. I wish there was something like specimen as a
plugin. Why specimen? Because if you're editing
a bank of sound clips from "The Simpons" rather
than a Piano, it makes more sense from a user
perspective.
AFAIK, there is nothing (except /maybe/ linuxsampler +
gigedit) that currently meets this need. If you can name
some others, please do.
Composite needs a sampler like this as a core part of the
application. I can't use linuxsampler because I disagree
with its license. So, I've been refactoring Hydrogen's
sampler to meet Composite's needs... and I'm doing it in a
way so that other people can benefit even if they don't want
to use Composite.
And this literally benefits everyone, no matter what your
DSP design philosophy: everything-as-a-plugin (LV2), "the
modular way" (lv2_jack_host), and monolithic apps
(libTritium).
-gabriel
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Mar 22 20:15:08 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Mar 22 2010 - 20:15:08 EET