Re: [LAD] guitarix-0.08.0 release 'Rockers'

hermann wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 14.05.2010, 19:16 +0200 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
>
>> Philipp Überbacher wrote:
>>
>>> Excerpts from Ralf Mardorf's message of 2010-05-14 17:57:11 +0200:
>>>
>>>
>>>> C++ flags : -march=native -Wall
>>>> -std=c++0x -O3 -DNDEBUG
>>>> Use faust : no
>>>> Use internal zita-resampler : yes
>>>> Use internal zita-convolver : no
>>>> Experimental Extensions : no
>>>> Install prefix : /usr/local
>>>> Install binary : /usr/local/bin
>>>> Install ladspa : /usr/local/lib/ladspa
>>>> Guitarix style directory : /usr/local/share/guitarix/skins
>>>> Guitarix builder directory :
>>>> /usr/local/share/guitarix/builder
>>>> Guitarix pixmaps directory : /usr/local/share/pixmaps
>>>>
>>>> 'configure' finished successfully (0.516s)
>>>> # ./waf build
>>>> Waf: Entering directory `/usr/src/guitarix-0.08.0/build'
>>>> [ 1/43] cxx: ladspa/crybaby.cpp -> build/default/ladspa/crybaby_1.o
>>>> [ 2/43] cxx: ladspa/distortion.cpp -> build/default/ladspa/distortion_2.o
>>>> cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option "-std=c++0x"
>>>> cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option "-std=c++0x"
>>>> Waf: Leaving directory `/usr/src/guitarix-0.08.0/build'
>>>> Build failed
>>>> -> task failed (err #1):
>>>> {task: cxx distortion.cpp -> distortion_2.o}
>>>> -> task failed (err #1):
>>>> {task: cxx crybaby.cpp -> crybaby_1.o}
>>>>
>>>> Will try again and read the README tonight. Anyway any hints are welcome!
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for Guitarix,
>>>> Ralf
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Hi Ralf,
>>> I don't know much about all that, but it looks to me as if your version
>>> of g++ doesn't know of -std=c++0x, hence it's too old.
>>> However, it might be possible to compile it without that (with an older
>>> c++ standard instead).
>>>
>
> No, not without rewrite a part of the midi learn function.
>
>>> It compiles just fine here with gcc 4.5.0.
>>>
>>>
>> Thank you Philipp :)
>>
>> $ g++ --version
>> g++ (GCC) 4.2.4 (Ubuntu 4.2.4-1ubuntu4)
>>
>
> That's strange, guitarix need gcc >= 0 9.3 and check for that during
> configure, normal it must break with a error message that you need g++
> 4.3. That's seems to be a bug.
>

Here we have got a bug ;).

>> I wondered about the "0x" too, ok, I'm running 64 Studio 3.0-beta3 =
>> Ubuntu Hardy, it's outdated ;).
>>
> Here is some information about c++0x
> http://www2.research.att.com/~bs/C++0xFAQ.html
>

I exactly was linked to the same side, after reading Philipp's mail and
searching the web.

>> I wished coders for audio could take care of this issue, as often as
>> possible, because audio distributions often do lag behind current
>> software versions.
>>
>
> We put a lot work in be backward compatible, but at some points we need
> to decide to go forward.
>

And you don't made a bad decision by using a more updated version :) ...
I did add ...

>> No big deal at the moment :).
>>

;). I do agree that Hardy is really outdated.

Thank you for the explainations Hermann,
Ralf
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sat May 15 00:15:01 2010