Ricardus Vincente wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 11:54 -0700, Veronica Merryfield wrote:
>
>
>> Just thinking about what I had wrote and remembered the semantics used here...
>>
>>
>>> One more hint: card X is a very high end one. It should
>>> be 'perfect', or at least much better than card A.
>>>
>> ... which might suggest that Card X is not performing well. Since it has been stated the card x is not USB, it is possible that this card has it's audio clock derived from the PC clock which is likely dithered - they call it spread spectrum to help reduce radiated noise in testing.
>>
>
> I blame Gremlins.
>
> Do I win?
>
> Ricardus...
>
I blame laws of nature and I'm right with this, but I guess it's a
little bit to abstract, not the complete wanted answer.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sat May 29 00:15:13 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat May 29 2010 - 00:15:13 EEST