On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Robin Gareus <robin@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On 06/08/2010 09:07 PM, Chris Cannam wrote:
>> So: reply-to-list is better if you have it, but if you don't, use reply-to-all.
>
> mmh "better" in what way?
"better" in that I have seen complaints from people here before about
getting duplicate copies from reply-to-all. Using reply-to-list
presumably avoids that.
I wouldn't really know, I don't have reply-to-list either and don't
greatly care. Thought it might cut down some potential objections
though.
Chris
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed Jun 9 00:15:02 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jun 09 2010 - 00:15:02 EEST