Re: [LAD] twice as loud

From: <fons@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Jul 23 2010 - 00:13:45 EEST

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:50:58PM +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:

> We may be comparing the wrong thing when we compare with the size of
> objects to loudness.

Indeed. I did not mention the visual analogy to suggest
that the two domains are similar - rather to point out
they are not. Something that works for one of them does
not for the other.

> I wonder how well we can judge something like twice the
> brightness.

Same problem. I gues we can't. Or that whatever value
of 'double' we arrive at will be without meaning.

My guess so far, but I have *NO* scientific evidence at
all to support it, just some intuition, is that human
perception of loudness of a sound is somehow related to
the extent that a particular sound does prevent us to
detect other known sounds, i.e. to masking effects.

CIao,

-- 
FA
There are three of them, and Alleline.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Jul 23 00:15:11 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jul 23 2010 - 00:15:11 EEST