On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 22:04 +0200, fons@email-addr-hidden wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:42:49PM -0700, Niels Mayer wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:35 PM, <fons@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> > > Not really, EQ normally being pre-fader. Post-fader meters in a mixer
> > > strip are useful only of the signal being metered is actually one
> > > that is physically available on some connector, e.g. as a direct out.
> > > It would not indicate any overload that occurs pre-fader.
> >
> > The only time I've seen EQ pre-frader is low-cut on a microphone
> > preamp.
>
> Then you haven't seen any of the >100 mixers I've seen and
> worked on. In fact, as far as I can remember, I've *never*
> seen any mixer that had its EQ post-fader. Nor one with
> post-fader inserts, and there are good reasons for that.
>
> Ciao,
Low-cut and EQs should be pre-fader and just the EQs + the fader should
be switchable between pre-aux and no EQs + fader for aux, while low-cut
always should be pre-aux too.
Anything else is very unusual.
- Ralf
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Aug 13 00:15:03 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 13 2010 - 00:15:03 EEST