On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 23:27 +0100, Thomas Mayer wrote:
> On 15.12.2010 22:09, Arnold Krille wrote:
> > On Wednesday 15 December 2010 21:50:19 David Olofson wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 15 December 2010, at 19.56.04, Arnold Krille
> >> <arnold@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>
> >>> Some months back fbi had to admit that current encryption is to good for
> >>> them. After a year of trying they returned a hard-disk (which Mexican
> >>> police asked them to decrypt) admitting they couldn't do anything to get
> >>> the data... Went through fefe's blog...
> >>
> >> ...or maybe the files were just truly random noise from an analog source?
> >> ;-)
> >>
> >> ...or the FBI just *said* they couldn't do it, to lull us all into a false
> >> sense of security.
> >
> > Lets take a rational view:
>
> Let's go back to paranoia: Theo de Raadt's mail of yesterday
>
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=129236621626462&w=2
>
> cu Thomas
Paranoia! I'm sceptic, but I do agree with Arnold, that OpenPGP is
relative save. I'm just joking about possibilities to hack OpenPGP.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Dec 16 04:15:08 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Dec 16 2010 - 04:15:08 EET