Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?

Stop forking around

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:57 PM, drew Roberts <zotz@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> On Thursday 27 January 2011 11:56:22 Paul Davis wrote:
> > i just don't remember other cases where major existing FLOSS projects
> > were forked
>
> This is not about what is going in in this thread in any direct way. (Or
> may
> not be at least, I do not know enough to say I guess.)
>
> What if I "fork" a project because I think it gives me a good starting
> point
> or base for what I want to do but the direction I intend to take things
> will
> result in a completely different sort of program to the one I forked?
> Should
> that still be considered a fork or is there another term for such a beast?
> Would another term be useful?
>
> all the best,
>
> drew
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
>

-- 
"Cheshire-Puss," she began, "would you tell me, please,
which way I ought to go from here?"
"That depends a good deal on where you want to get to," said the Cat.
"I don't care much where--" said Alice.
"Then it doesn't matter which way you go," said the Cat.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Jan 28 00:15:07 2011