Re: [LAD] RDF libraries, was Re: [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb

From: Stefano D'Angelo <zanga.mail@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Feb 25 2011 - 22:13:21 EET

2011/2/25 Olivier Guilyardi <list@email-addr-hidden>:
> On 02/25/2011 08:57 PM, David Robillard wrote:
>
>>> It's a few months ago now that I investigated LV2. IIRC, at that time I
>>> concluded that this wasn't an option because SLV2 was GPL'ed. But things are
>>> changing IIUC :)
>>
>> You never asked. I would have changed it... but I am not psychic ;)
>
> It's not always easy to discuss about religious matters, such as licenses ;)
>
> That said there is another big problem. This glib dependency, it's way too heavy
> for mobile deployment.

Since this was already discussed and we happen to have possible GLib
replacements, could you expand on that? Why is it too heavy?

Stefano
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sat Feb 26 00:15:04 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Feb 26 2011 - 00:15:05 EET