2011/3/4 James Morris <jwm.art.net@email-addr-hidden>:
> But if the job of validation is down to the UI, the engine can be more
> efficient.
The current LV2 spec says that the plugin's "engine" should validate
its inputs anyway... IIRC, there is a draft/experimental extension
that allows the host to specify that it will take care of that, but I
haven't seen it used yet (and probably it should be that way until it
gets "serious enough").
However, I have no idea whether how much performance gain you would
obtain from that and/or if it allows to do stuff that you can't do
now.
In my (admittedly limited) experience in developing LV2 plugins, it
shouldn't be much of a problem.
Stefano
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Mar 4 16:15:03 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Mar 04 2011 - 16:15:03 EET