Hello,
On Thursday, March 31, 2011 04:25:45 pm Conrad Berhörster
wrote:
> Hi gerald,
>
> Op den Middeweken 30 März 2011 Klock 09:45:16 hett Gerald
Mwangi schreven:
> > Thanx all, tritium looks very much like my own
> > preliminary design. One question, does it mask JACK so
> > that I only have to use the Tritium API (only
> > JACK-Audio, not Midi)?
Well, yes and no. :-) Tritium is very modular (and
becoming more so).
For example, the Tritium::MixerImpl class we talked about --
it just manages and mixes buffers. It doesn't directly
interface to any audio API's. The audio API's are pretty
modular, but not quite ready for "general purpose" use.
Meanwhile Tritium::Engine sets up the whole sequencer engine
and takes care of JACK for you... but that's not what you
want.
> > I also don't see any support for Inserts/plugins in the
> > channel class. Am I wrong?
At the moment it's handled like an old mixer board where you
have 4 send/returns and you mix in each channel to go to it.
This is inherited from Hydrogen, and I haven't decided if I
want to do per-channel pre/post insers.
> i think, tritium is a little bit to big for your needs.
Too big? I disagree.
Too immature? Yes, indeed! :-)
> further , it depends on QT,
It only depends on QtCore and QtXml... which isn't /that/
bad. :-)
> has all this midi stuff an
> lots of song/player logic.
...which can be omitted if you application doesn't use it.
-gabriel
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Apr 1 04:15:03 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 01 2011 - 04:15:03 EEST