On 13 April 2011 12:44, James Morris <jwm.art.net@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On 13 April 2011 12:42, Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>> please read your qjackctl/about box whether there's a "JACK Session support
>> disabled" written in red. that should say it all
>
> Yeah, that says it all :/ Doh. Thanks.
...
The ARCH qjackctl package needs to be rebuilt against the newer JACK
then... ? The release date of the ARCH package is a couple of days
after the release of the recent QjackCtl. Will QjackCTL cope if it was
built with JACK Session support (on machine x) but running (on machine
y) against a JACK without session support?
Cheers,
James.
> James.
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed Apr 13 16:15:03 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 13 2011 - 16:15:03 EEST