Re: [LAD] questions about jack session

On 04/13/2011 01:00 PM, James Morris wrote:
> On 13 April 2011 12:44, James Morris<jwm.art.net@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>> On 13 April 2011 12:42, Rui Nuno Capela<rncbc@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>>> please read your qjackctl/about box whether there's a "JACK Session support
>>> disabled" written in red. that should say it all
>>
>> Yeah, that says it all :/ Doh. Thanks.
>
> ...
>
> The ARCH qjackctl package needs to be rebuilt against the newer JACK
> then... ? The release date of the ARCH package is a couple of days
> after the release of the recent QjackCtl. Will QjackCTL cope if it was
> built with JACK Session support (on machine x) but running (on machine
> y) against a JACK without session support?
>

theoretically yes but murphy may have a different opinion ;)

byee

-- 
rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela
rncbc@email-addr-hidden
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev