[LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?

From: James Morris <jwm.art.net@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Jun 10 2011 - 01:22:58 EEST

Hi,

Since working on Petri-Foo I keep returning to the idea that perhaps
it would be better to add a sampler-waveform to Yoshimi or another
soft-synth. Too bad I'm not that great a coder.

Anyway, the idea seems so obvious now. Are there any good reasons for why not?

Just an idea I wanted to put out.

James.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Jun 10 04:15:01 2011

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Folderol: "Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?"
Previous message: hermann: "[LAD] [LAA] [ANN] guitarix bug fix release guitarix2-0.16.0"
Next in thread: Folderol: "Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?"
Reply: Folderol: "Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?"
Reply: Devin Anderson: "Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?"
Maybe reply: Philipp Ãœberbacher: "Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?"
Maybe reply: Philipp Ãœberbacher: "Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?"
Maybe reply: James Morris: "Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?"
Maybe reply: Folderol: "Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?"
Reply: Jaromír Mike¹: "Re: [LAD] Synth/Sampler why the distinction?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 10 2011 - 04:15:01 EEST