On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Robin Gareus <robin@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> Is "quit w/o save" really needed? IMHO a smarter way would be to
> "auto-save" the session every e.g. 5 mins and add keep those as
> revisions in a repository.
if you think about it, this is also quite intrusive on application
architecture. quit-with-save has all kinds of reasonably safe
assumptions that can be made, even though some of them are not
actually documented. the entire JACK graph is shutting down, the
clients' job is to save data. contrast with an auto-save, where normal
processing must continue even as it happens.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Jul 3 20:15:01 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jul 03 2011 - 20:15:01 EEST