On 09/04/2011 02:42 AM, Paul Davis wrote:
> the issues with the performance of boost::function are reasonably well
> known and were well documented in the article that florian linked to,
> along with a much better performing drop-in replacement.
Correction: It wasn't me ;D It was Pedro Alves who posted that link. I
was not aware of these performance issues. And in my usecase they are
irrelevant, so I'll stick with boost::function. For other designs it
might be worth reconsidering though..
Flo
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Sep 4 16:15:01 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Sep 04 2011 - 16:15:01 EEST