On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Emanuel Rumpf <xbran@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> While this is restrictive, in the way you mention, I think it's a
> welcome simplification
> ( compared to implementing a real-time-capable-linked-list + other
> rt-structures ),
> if your use-case doesn't require direct calls to the list (for any reason),
> then you could request insert/remove/update operations through the
> rt-ring-buffer.
you can't perform insert/remove/update operations on a "normal" linked
list in an RT thread.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Nov 4 20:15:01 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 04 2011 - 20:15:01 EET