On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hiddenwrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Emanuel Rumpf <xbran@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> > While this is restrictive, in the way you mention, I think it's a
> > welcome simplification
> > ( compared to implementing a real-time-capable-linked-list + other
> > rt-structures ),
> > if your use-case doesn't require direct calls to the list (for any
> reason),
> > then you could request insert/remove/update operations through the
> > rt-ring-buffer.
>
> you can't perform insert/remove/update operations on a "normal" linked
> list in an RT thread.
>
Sorry, what do you need instead? ( trying hard to absorb all this.. )
thanks
iain
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Nov 4 20:15:02 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 04 2011 - 20:15:02 EET