On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hiddenwrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Iain Duncan <iainduncanlists@email-addr-hidden>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks, that clarifies things a lot for me. I didn't think about the disk
> > seeking issue. (For my app, my intent is to have everything in RAM for
> live
> > playing ). Was the intent of the jack looping transport proposal to allow
> > clients to know that they were looping and do seamless looping too if
> they
> > are able?
>
> yes.
>
Off the official ardourd-jack roadmap record, do you think there's a
realistic chance of this still happening in the next few years? At least
for Ardour? I might code such that I can use ardour with it when available
if that's in the works because that would be super cool, but I totally get
that it may be a very low priority for Ardour dev.
iain
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Nov 20 20:15:03 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Nov 20 2011 - 20:15:03 EET