Am 5. März 2012 12:24 schrieb Fons Adriaensen <fons@linuxaudio.org>:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 12:55:39AM +0100, Albert Graef wrote:
>
>> Well, what you see as a problem, I see as a virtue. It gives me the
>> flexibility to just pick my own set of messages for the application at
>> hand. The sequencer shouldn't have to care about the particular set of
>> OSC addresses I'm using.
>
> Agreed 100%.
>
>
Agreed 40%
Having a standard scheeme for _standard procedures
doesn't kill your freedom to still pick custom addresses / add
your own extensions to OSC,
but simplifies things A LOT for those 90% of users who do standard things,
as playing back notes and controlling typical values (e.g. velocity,
volume, resonance...)
Thus you wouldn't lose any virtue, but those 90% woud gain some.
-- E.R. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Mon Mar 5 16:15:02 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Mar 05 2012 - 16:15:02 EET