Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging

On 03/23/2012 12:44 AM, David Robillard wrote:
> I don't plan on releasing in multiple ways. Whatever The Way(TM) is,
> that is the way. If people want one, it's *just* one. Maintaining this
> stuff is enough effort when it only needs releasing in one way.

Sounds fair.

> Programs and documentation should be packaged separately though. Since
> most build systems that build docs do it all in one go, I assume
> packagers are already accustomed to piecing up things that are installed
> in one command by the source build system?

Yes. At least that's the way it is on the distros I know. This depends
on the distro's packaging policies, though. In any case, I'd say that's
something you can just leave up to the downstream maintainers.

Albert

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email:  Dr.Graef@email-addr-hidden-online.de, ag@email-addr-hidden-mainz.de
WWW:    http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev