On 04/03/2012 07:04 PM, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
> now, i could suggest NSM API to be split in levels of compliance and
> restrictiveness, so to speak:
>
> - level 0 :- clients just store/retrieve their own private state from a
> supplied and independent session sub-directory; no GUI File menu
> restrictions; no file location restrictions, no symlinks, no juggling,
> no dupes, no sh*t.
>
> - level 1+ :- anything that (may progressively?) imposes each one the
> mentioned non-restrictions of level 0.
How much more effort will it be in terms of coding, to implement
'level-1' versus 'level-0'?
\r
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed Apr 4 16:15:02 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 04 2012 - 16:15:02 EEST