Re: [LAD] NSM - handling large files

From: Emanuel Rumpf <xbran@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Apr 04 2012 - 16:25:02 EEST

Am 4. April 2012 11:18 schrieb rosea.grammostola <rosea.grammostola@email-addr-hidden>:
>
> How much more effort will it be in terms of coding, to implement 'level-1'
> versus 'level-0'?
>

For anyone who prefers to work with "apps-do-whatever-they-want" appraoch
or "we-have-zero-to-X-support-levels-so-you-dont-know-what-to-expect" ,
there are alternatives: JackSession, Lash, Ladish.

I would prefere at least *one* SM to have a clean and handy solution
and hope that is NSM.

I have to dig deeper into the NSM-API myself,
but currently it's not obvious to me,
why disabling a few menu-items and using
symlinks in the session-dir. is recognized as
impregnable obstacle.

-- 
E.R.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed Apr 4 16:15:02 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 04 2012 - 16:15:02 EEST