Re: [LAD] NSM - handling large files

From: Fons Adriaensen <fons@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Apr 04 2012 - 16:51:20 EEST

On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:25:02PM +0000, Emanuel Rumpf wrote:
 
> For anyone who prefers to work with "apps-do-whatever-they-want" appraoch
> or "we-have-zero-to-X-support-levels-so-you-dont-know-what-to-expect" ,
> there are alternatives: JackSession, Lash, Ladish.
>
> I would prefere at least *one* SM to have a clean and handy solution

votes++

> and hope that is NSM.
 
> I have to dig deeper into the NSM-API myself,
> but currently it's not obvious to me,
> why disabling a few menu-items and using
> symlinks in the session-dir. is recognized as
> impregnable obstacle.

I fail to see that as well. And I may be an unrecoverable
individualist, but if ever I add session management to any
app then that app will obey the NSM rules or very similar
ones if the session manager is not NSM - it is the obvious
thing to do if you want something that works.

Ciao,

-- 
FA
A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed Apr 4 16:15:02 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 04 2012 - 16:15:02 EEST