Re: [LAD] NSM - handling large files

On 04/04/2012 02:22 PM, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
> On 04/04/2012 12:18 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
>> On 04/03/2012 07:04 PM, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
>>> now, i could suggest NSM API to be split in levels of compliance and
>>> restrictiveness, so to speak:
>>>
>>> - level 0 :- clients just store/retrieve their own private state from a
>>> supplied and independent session sub-directory; no GUI File menu
>>> restrictions; no file location restrictions, no symlinks, no juggling,
>>> no dupes, no sh*t.
>>>
>>> - level 1+ :- anything that (may progressively?) imposes each one the
>>> mentioned non-restrictions of level 0.
>>
>> How much more effort will it be in terms of coding, to implement
>> 'level-1' versus 'level-0'?
>>
>
> speaking from qtractor pov.:
>
> - level 0: minimal effort as it would be a probable and simple
> rephrasing and/or adaptation of the code already in place for
> jack-session; also, there's this osc branch somewhat lurking in svn to
> get readily merged and apply for the NSM/OSC interface.
>
> - level 1+: pervasive change and effort; almost brand new application
> overhaul (iow. won't happen any time soon:) sorry.

Another question. If you compare NSM level 0 (!) with JackSession. Which
session manager do you prefer and why?

Regards,
\r
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed Apr 4 16:15:02 2012