Am Sonntag, den 29.04.2012, 11:07 -0400 schrieb Paul Davis:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:41 AM, hermann <brummer-@web.de> wrote:
>
> > Is anyone here on the list knowing what is to do now, what could we do
> > to make the provider aware that he must offer the source in the same way
> > then the binary's,
>
> this part is not quite true. its generally accepted that as long as
> the source is freel available from an identifiable online location,
> then notifying people who received the binaries of their rights and
> the location from which the source can be obtained is sufficient *if
> there are no modifications*
But he fail already by notify people of there rights.
How could one say if there are modifications ?
Anyhow, for sure there is GPL'd software included, witch is modified,
and isn't available at a online location.
He claim it as a modified slackware "OS" build.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Apr 29 20:15:02 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Apr 29 2012 - 20:15:02 EEST