Am Sonntag, den 29.04.2012, 15:44 -0500 schrieb Jan Depner:
> On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 11:07 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:41 AM, hermann <brummer-@web.de> wrote:
> >
> > > Is anyone here on the list knowing what is to do now, what could we do
> > > to make the provider aware that he must offer the source in the same way
> > > then the binary's,
> >
> > this part is not quite true. its generally accepted that as long as
> > the source is freel available from an identifiable online location,
> > then notifying people who received the binaries of their rights and
> > the location from which the source can be obtained is sufficient *if
> > there are no modifications*
>
> I agree with Paul. He's got all of the included package's web site
> links on his web site. If you want to duplicate what he's done you can
> just jump to all of those links, get all the source code, and build it
> yourself. Thirty bucks doesn't sound like too high a price to avoid the
> headaches though (assuming it works ;-)
>
> Jan
>
The link list is far away from "all".
eg.: libs, kernel, etc.
The price is not in question. But I think, if one use GPL'd software
commercial, the distributor must make sure that the source is available
to the users, I mean the complete source here.
This stick is a bit more then a bundle of applications were a link to
some project site will suite the requirements of the GPL.
hermann
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Apr 30 08:15:01 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 30 2012 - 08:15:02 EEST