Re: [LAD] Plugin block length restrictions

On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 11:41 +0000, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 07:15:32PM -0400, David Robillard wrote:
>
> > Well, this effort which you have so vehemently attacked was an effort to
> > establish this functionality in hosts.
>
> I did not attack that effort (which I see as a good thing), nor LV2
> in general.
>
> I did 'attack'
>
> 1. Your statement (in your original post) that zero-latency convolution
> requires synchronous operation and does not allow the use of threads,
>
> 2. Your statement (in a later post) that the multithreaded approach used
> by zita-convolver leads to less stable and reliable systems.
>
> Both statements are wrong, that's all there is to it.

Whatever. Congratulations, you are right (and nobody cares).

You have also completely killed any incentive to work on that supposedly
good effort.

-dr

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev