Re: [LAD] forking (was Re: Aeolus)

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 05:35:45PM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

> i compared that to the aeolus source-code as shipped in debian (as i
> was too lazy to go to Fons' homepage) and find that the two files are
> virtually identical, apart from a rename (.cc -> .cpp), a different
> indentation style and the said added copyright.

And in some files, renaming variables to 'hungarian' style. Which
pretty much excludes the possibility of any 'improvements' being
integrated with the original.
 
> i'm pretty sure that maurizio's "contributions" do not justify the
> added copyright.

Plus that in order to to do what he claims (provide an OSC interface)
you don't need to touch this file at all, it's part of the DSP code.
Aeolus already has a pretty complete separation of DSP and GUI, the
latter technically being a plugin and communicating with the rest
via asynchronous messages only. So to OSC-ify Aeolus you only need
to write a new plugin.

Ciao,

-- 
FA
A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev