On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 13:50:52 +0100 Ralf Mardorf
<ralf.mardorf@email-addr-hidden-dsl.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 00:29 +0100, Dominique Michel wrote:
> > And classical physics is even worst. In Einstein formula e=mc^2, the
> > only term for which we have a definition is c...
> >
> > For e, it is no definition, only equations which are not definitions
>
> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c9/E%3Dmc%C2%
> B2-explication.svg/220px-E%3Dmc%C2%B2-explication.svg.png
>
> The Definition for E is m*c². By your explanation we would als have no
> definition for c, since c also is an equation, c is m/s (another m ;).
> The only differences are that some values are constants and others are
> variables.
Please, no. c is a constant with the unit(!) m/s. m and s are no
variables... And the m in [c] = m/s is not the same as the m in E =
m*c².
- Arnold
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 06 2014 - 00:15:02 EET