Re: [LAD] Audio problem for numerical optimization

From: Gene Heskett <gheskett@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sat Mar 01 2014 - 14:32:42 EET

On Saturday 01 March 2014 07:27:53 Ralf Mardorf did opine:

> Hi Jeremia :)
>
> On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 07:49 +0100, user web210p1 wrote:
> > FFT is used as an example in the lecture so it cannot be used, unless
> > there is a significant additional computation involved.
>
> A less resource hungry JAMin would be nice, by keeping the sound quality
> it has got now.
>
> "JAMin uses FFT, so it's a quite CPU and memory hungry beast." -
> http://jamin.sourceforge.net/en/reqs.html

I have read, but not tested on big iron, that the "butterfly transform"
gives compatible results with a lot less big iron to do it.

I fooled with it 20 years ago on a big box amiga, it worked, but I couldn't
compare to the same depth of FFT because I couldn't find free FFT that SAS
C-6.58 would build.
 
> An example in a lecture isn't useful for any user. I don't know if
> significant additional computation is involved, but JAMin is important
> and much used software, not just a theoretical University kindergarten
> game, nobody ever would care about.
>
> Regards,
> Ralf
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Cheers, Gene

-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
NOTICE: Will pay 100 USD for an HP-4815A defective but
complete probe assembly.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sat Mar 1 16:15:02 2014

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Mar 01 2014 - 16:15:02 EET