On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Aurélien Leblond <blablack@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> As far as I can see I have 2 options:
> - Port the code to the c++11 standard - but you seem to think that's a bad
> idea
> - Compile this plugin with C99 - that's the solution I have in the git
> at the moment but I get the warning "cc1plus: warning: command line
> option ‘-std=c99’ is valid for C/ObjC but not for C++ [enabled by
> default]" and call me pedantic but I don't like warnings!
>
C99 is a *C* language standard, not a C++ language standard. There seems to
be some confusion here over what language the code you're trying to compile
really is.
Is it C? Then C99 is appropriate but need a few tweaks. c++11 would not be
appropriate.
Is it C++? Then C++11 is an option but is also relatively new, and so may
or may not be appropriate. C99 is not appropriate for C++ code.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Jan 5 00:15:02 2015
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 05 2015 - 00:15:02 EET