Re: [LAD] Strange Jack1 problem

From: Simon Jenkins <sjenkins@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Aug 12 2015 - 01:48:50 EEST

>> I think the underlying sort mechanism was the same before I did
>> that
>
> It seems to have been like that for as long as the the git history
> goes back, which is to 2006.

Fons,

Turns out my patch was late 2004 but I’ve confirmed — quick look — that minus the feedback connection stuff it was doing the same before. (Just gotta add there was also a substantial explanatory comment right where I dropped mine).

I note though that drivers were/are treated as a special case and forced to the front, and that historically the major use cases for Jack would have involved connections to a driver, likely the same driver, at some point. Not saying that fixes the problem but it may have helped disguise it for so long: It took your entirely free-floating n2j/j2n chain, plus other clients started and stopped at the right moment, before it did something noticeably wrong.

Simon
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed Aug 12 04:15:01 2015

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 12 2015 - 04:15:01 EEST