On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 21:17:43 +0200
Luis Garrido <luis@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On 02/09/15 21:04, Joakim Hernberg wrote:
>
> > Maybe not a huge problem and I suppose I'll set the latency
> > compensation somewhere in the middle of the results, but still I'm
> > curious of the mechanism behind this phenomena.
> >
>
> USB devices add some extra buffering, check out this thread:
>
> http://jack-audio.10948.n7.nabble.com/Differences-in-latency-between-USB-and-internal-audio-interfaces-td9071.html
Well yes, I'm aware of that and it was this extra latency that I wanted
to ascertain. What puzzles me is that each time the jack server is
invoked, it will need a different amount of latency compensation even
when no other parameters have changed.
I'll read that thread and it's links again, but IIRC they don't hold
the answer to my query.
-- Joakim _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Thu Sep 3 00:15:02 2015
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 03 2015 - 00:15:02 EEST