On 09/02/15 21:35, Joakim Hernberg wrote:
> Well yes, I'm aware of that and it was this extra latency that I
> wanted to ascertain. What puzzles me is that each time the jack server
> is invoked, it will need a different amount of latency compensation
> even when no other parameters have changed.
Didn't Fons mention a similar problem lately? (think two weeks ago).
He's currently travelling, but maybe you want to check out his patches
(yet to be posted).
Note that Fons' patches are only about client execution order in jackd1.
If you also get different values in jackd2, then it's either unrelated
or needs fixing as well.
Cheers
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Sep 3 04:15:02 2015
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 03 2015 - 04:15:02 EEST