Re: [LAD] aBLETON lINK

From: Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Sep 23 2016 - 16:56:55 EEST

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Tito Latini <tito.01beta@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 04:36:17PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Tito Latini <tito.01beta@email-addr-hidden>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:49:42PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> > > > The innovation is defining an API and protocol based on 3 concepts:
> > > >
> > > > tempo synchronization
> > >
> > > an integral to get the position with the new bpm
> > >
> >
> > across a network? with multiple tempo masters?
>
> I respectfully think you don't understand the technical problem.
>

   [ description ]

and yet ... no such protocol exists.

so it must all be very easy, particularly the part about gaining widespread
adoption, and yet nobody has done it, despite 30 years of protocols like
MIDI Clock, MIDI timecode, LTC and more.

puzzling, eh?

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Sep 23 20:15:02 2016

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Sep 23 2016 - 20:15:02 EEST