Re: [LAD] Any Rakarrack developers around here?

On 26-02-2020 22:30, Spencer Jackson wrote:
> It would be a nice feature add. It's highly unlikely to happen though
> unless someone outside of the project does the work, I'm not even sure
> they are active enough to accept a pull request.

Yes, I probably need to search for someone else outside the project.
Volunteers raise your hand please! :)

You can clone the git repo at least, if that's what you mean:

https://sourceforge.net/p/rakarrack/git/ci/master/tree/

>
> > I saw your plugins, but even with plugins, users seems to prefer
> > Rakarrack as a whole for certain composition work.
> >
>
> That is an interesting trend isn't it? Certainly the presets are much
> more convenient to use right from rakarrack than using the plugins. I
> had hoped my project would be used more, but OTOH I use them and I
> don't regret the effort.

It's interesting for sure...

Imho working with all the JACK applications can be a pain on Linux, but
with nsm support, the experience is much better. And then standalone
applications are preferable in certain situations actually. If I would
need one instance of Zynaddsubfx, I would always grab the standalone
version. If I need more instances, I might switch to Carla instead and
grab the plugin.

On the other hand, I know people are using Rakarrack, because you can
launch multiple instances and chain them together to create something
interesting.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev