On 4/4/21 11:06 PM, Nils Hilbricht wrote:
>> please read the subject line!
>> it's about the new-session-management move to jackaudio.org and only.
>> it is NOT about the merits, technical or otherwise, of session managers in general nor NSM in particular.
>
> Then let me rephrase:
> Why should NSM not be hosted under jackaudio, since it is the session manager for JACK programs?
> The response to that was "because NSM is technically independent of JACK" and my answer was in the previous mail.
>
allow me to kindly rephrase you:
... NSM ... is the *recommended* _session management_ for JACK programs!
(note the distinction between "management" and "manager")
and yes, I totally concur to that "NSM is technically independent of JACK".
the thing that makes NSM so "JACK-friendly" is only about one separate
utility/client program called "jackpatch"... nothing else technically
relates NSM to JACK and vice-versa.
regards
-- rncbc aka. Rui Nuno Capela rncbc@rncbc.org _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Mon Apr 5 04:15:02 2021
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 05 2021 - 04:15:02 EEST