Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] New plugins and fixes
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Apr 09 2002 - 19:43:15 EEST
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:17:16 +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> The best would be a bug report via the debian bug reporting system. I'm on
> Debian and I would do it, but I can't, because I build my own packages from
> your plugins and Anand's debian scripts, so the helper program "bug(1)"
> would report the bug to myself...
I run redhat, so I'm not really sure how to go about it.
> Damned, this one sounds hot like hell! And the name is the devil. But can
> it be, that Barry is burning quite some CPU cycles? I tested it in a PD
> patch, that showed between 5-20 percent cpu usage in gkrellm before, and
> now with one satanMaximiser plugin it went up to solid over 45 percent.
It shouldn't use that much, it takes about 1-2% on my PIIIM laptop. Its
possible that the cache usage is just tripping over the limit, but Barry
only touches a few dozen bytes, so it shouldn't be that dramatic.
What type of cpu are you using? What happens if you add another Barry?
- Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Apr 09 2002 - 19:30:27 EEST