Re: [linux-audio-user] is ext3 ok for real-time / low-latency?

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] is ext3 ok for real-time / low-latency?
From: Jan \ (eviltwin69_AT_cableone.net)
Date: Sat Feb 15 2003 - 21:32:33 EET


I haven't had any problems on my system and I've had a couple of pretty
nasty power outages.

On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 11:50, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Mark Knecht hat gesagt: // Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> > I am using reiserfs. I think it's better for trying to get to the lowest
> > latencies. That said, if you wanted to run at 5-10mS, probably either
> > would be OK.
>
> How is the state of reiserfs, when it comes to repair broken
> filesystems? This was a serious issue some months ago and really kept
> me from installing reiser, and made me use ext3. Are the
> reiserfsck-tools stable now?
>
> And what's this with the ext3-LL-conflict? Will I run into problems
> when using a more current kernel than 2.4.18?
>
> ciao
> --
> Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Feb 15 2003 - 21:51:03 EET