Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [Jackit-devel] Ahh
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Thu May 15 2003 - 18:02:50 EEST
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 02:46:16 +0100, Tim Hall wrote:
> On Thursday 15 May 2003 11:20, Steve Harris wrote:
> > I have been considering a mailing list so I can get consensus on bug
> > reports, if there are enough interested people I'l set one up.
>
> I've only just started using the swh & ladspa plug-ins in conjunction with
> 'sweep'. While we're on this thread my immediate reaction is to the general
> labelling - great if you're an engineer - a bit confusing if you're 'just' a
> musician trying to make the best of a previously analogue recording. It would
> be useful to have a plain language description of what the plug-in is
> supposed to do when you bring it up and also what units you're entering,
> possibly with a suggested range.
This is a valid point. One problem is that I generaly design them assuming
that there will be a UI at some point, but this has never happened.
> Scuse if this is a bit OT, and yes, you're damn right, I didn't RTFM yet :-)
http://plugin.org.uk/ladspa-swh/docs/ladspa-swh.html ;)
the docs could definatly do with work though.
- Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu May 15 2003 - 18:33:28 EEST