Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Best and Worst?
From: Greg Reddin (gtreddin_AT_yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Aug 05 2003 - 16:32:32 EEST
> I personally (as a RG developer) like this aspect; it means that
> you treat every synth in the same way and the program behaves
> more or less identically whether you're using soft synths or
> hardware synths. For a long time I've been moaning to people
> (and to the LAD list, on occasion) that I'd like to see a
> standalone GUI app specifically for managing soft synths: to me
> that would be better than doing so from within the sequencer.
> In the absence of such a thing, Rosegarden probably will acquire
> the ability to start and stop synths at some point. I'm not
> sure whether we'll ever go to the extent of running them in-
> process like (I think) MusE does.
Yeah, after I sent that email I thought about the fact that MusE
probably starts the synths in-process and I can see drawbacks to that
approach in certain situations. I do like the fact that RG handles
evrerything as generic MIDI. The thing I don't like about it is that
it forces me to do extra work outside of Rosegarden to get things
going.
Greg
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Aug 05 2003 - 16:38:01 EEST