Re: [linux-audio-user] Linux synths

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Linux synths
From: Ken Locarnini (renueden_AT_earthlink.net)
Date: Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:06:37 EEST


Hi Atte,
I've used Csound alot in the past too. Mostly command line from Common Music which I like alot. I'm trying to go more real-time though now. I just decided I would try and get into PD!

How is your orchestra set-up. Do you have 1 synth per instrument per channel? I always had a hard time in Csound as I wanted to have 1 synth per 16 channels and have them all have their own set of presets. PD supports multiple midi ports so I thought that would probably work, though learning another language will be tough as I know Csound well. I also want the graphic routines, and as you know Csound dosen't have the Opengl stuff in Linux, (yet). I also don't understand the status of Csound right now. Is anyone actually working on coding Csound5? I'm on the lists but can't tell.
Thanks,
Ken

-----Original Message-----
From: Atte Andr? Jensen <atte_AT_ballbreaker.dk>
Sent: Sep 15, 2003 8:47 AM
To: linux-audio-user_AT_music.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Linux synths

On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 07:44:23 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
Ken Locarnini <renueden_AT_earthlink.net> wrote:

> I'm happy to be back after about 2 years away from Linux. The
> audio/music world seems to be taking off and thats great.

Indeed!

> I'd like some general comments on what would be peoples favorite
> reactor type synth in Linux as of now. I'm primarily interested in
> realtime, multi timbral midi controlled synths.

I simply love csound. It's flexible, powerful, stable and well
documented. I know that some (most?) people find the fact that it's text
based a minus, but I don't agree. After working with pd intensely for a
couple of weeks I realized that I work much faster in csound.

I'm running csound under debian/unstable on kernel 2.6.0-test5 with a
csound buffersize of 128 on a PIV 2400 laptop, using Evolution USB
keyboards as controllers. I have more polyphony in real time than I can
use with two hands for "normal" (subtractive, fm, sample playback,
soundfont playback, additive) patches. This is even with a few global FX
units (chorus, delay and rotary speaker) running all the time.

The only not-so-nice thing about csound is that I didn't manage (or try
that hard, actually) to make it run alongside other sound-producing
applications, including jack, pd or fluidsynth. Could be a problem if
you want to use LADSPA plugins or do hd-recording...

> How about sequencers?

I didn't work much with sequencers under linux, but FWIW I've settled on
Muse. Needless to say it's quite simple to route midi events from Muse
to csound.

-- 
peace, love & harmony
Atte


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Sep 15 2003 - 19:38:44 EEST