Re: [linux-audio-user] Latency question (was: Delta 1010LT Preamp Gain)

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Latency question (was: Delta 1010LT Preamp Gain)
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Sep 23 2003 - 22:38:49 EEST


On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:48:41 -0700, Greg Reddin wrote:
> So it sounds like this is a fixed latency -- meaning that Jamin is

More or less, yes.

> doing some buffering of its own on top of Jack. Is that the case in
> most apps of this nature like Freqtweak? Is it just not possible to
> do this kind of processing without additional buffering?

Freqtweak and JAMin both use the FFT algorithm, its not possible* to run
it without additional latency.

- Steve

* Actually thats not true, its just far too expensive to run it at very
  low latencies. halving the latency doubles the cpu cost, and it only
  works to a point.


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Sep 23 2003 - 22:53:04 EEST