Re: [linux-audio-user] That whole mp3 vs. ogg vs. wma vs. yomamma thing

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] That whole mp3 vs. ogg vs. wma vs. yomamma thing
From: Mark Knecht (markknecht_AT_comcast.net)
Date: Sun Oct 12 2003 - 21:02:36 EEST


On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 10:17, Jan Depner wrote:
> What, exactly, do you mean by music that could be released by a major
> label? That really has nothing to do with the tools used to record,
> mix, and master the music. It has to do with the music and the
> performers. It also has to do with how the song was mixed and
> mastered. The tools are available in Linux to do this. I'm waiting for
> Ron Parker to wade in on this subject since he is running a working
> studio. Check out http://myweb.cableone.net/eviltwin69/gmc2.ogg. This
> is sort of a blues tune. Bruce Iglauer at Alligator Records (largest
> blues label in the world) liked it. I don't think he really cared what
> it was recorded, mixed, or mastered on. Unfortunately, as with all
> bands, that one folded due to it's own internal problems. If you want
> to find some music done with Linux you need to check out Dave Phillips'
> Linux Sound and MIDI page - http://linux-sound.org/. Specifically the
> Linux Music On-line section.
>
> Jan
>

Jan,
   I like the tune. Good job, and that counts whether this was done on
Linux or not.

Cheers,
Mark


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Oct 12 2003 - 21:33:18 EEST