Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] That whole mp3 vs. ogg vs. wma vs. yomamma thing
From: Benjamin Flaming (lau_AT_solobanjo.com)
Date: Sun Oct 12 2003 - 21:15:29 EEST
Uffda. Sorry about that. It was 6:30 in the morning, and I hadn't been to bed yet ;)
Mostly, I'm just frustrated by the examples provided on the web sites for open-source synths and drum machine apps. I should have either kept my mouth shut, though, or written a less nebulous explanation of what I'm hoping for.
Sorry.
|)
|)enji
On 12 Oct 2003 12:17:29 -0500
Jan Depner <eviltwin69_AT_cableone.net> wrote:
> What, exactly, do you mean by music that could be released by a major
> label? That really has nothing to do with the tools used to record,
> mix, and master the music. It has to do with the music and the
> performers. It also has to do with how the song was mixed and
> mastered. The tools are available in Linux to do this. I'm waiting for
> Ron Parker to wade in on this subject since he is running a working
> studio. Check out http://myweb.cableone.net/eviltwin69/gmc2.ogg. This
> is sort of a blues tune. Bruce Iglauer at Alligator Records (largest
> blues label in the world) liked it. I don't think he really cared what
> it was recorded, mixed, or mastered on. Unfortunately, as with all
> bands, that one folded due to it's own internal problems. If you want
> to find some music done with Linux you need to check out Dave Phillips'
> Linux Sound and MIDI page - http://linux-sound.org/. Specifically the
> Linux Music On-line section.
>
> Jan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Oct 12 2003 - 21:29:25 EEST